The Supreme Court questioned the validity of Muslim men authorizing lawyers to issue Talaq-e-Hasan notices, deeming it a practice that leaves women vulnerable. The bench stressed that divorce requires the husband’s direct pronouncement and signature, not delegation to third parties. This judicial scrutiny brings renewed attention to the constitutional validity of this divorce method.
Talaak-e-Hasan explained: Why it’s under scrutiny, and how it differs from triple talaq
Published on
